info@scholarlycommon.com +91-98765-43210
Policies

Peer Review Policy

Our commitment to rigorous, impartial peer review as the cornerstone of quality scholarly publishing.

Double-Blind Peer Review

Rigorous and Impartial Evaluation

Most journals published through Scholarly Common follow a double-blind peer-review process, where the identities of authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the evaluation process.

This process helps ensure the academic quality and credibility of published research by removing potential bias from the review process.

The peer review process typically involves:
Initial editorial screening for scope and quality
Evaluation by independent expert reviewers
Editorial decision based on reviewer feedback
01
Submission
Author submits manuscript to the journal system.
02
Editorial Screening
Editor reviews for scope, quality, and compliance.
03
Reviewer Assignment
Independent experts in the field are invited to review.
04
Blind Evaluation
Reviewers assess the work without knowing the authors' identities.
05
Editorial Decision
Editor makes a decision based on reviewer feedback.
06
Author Notification
Authors are informed of the decision and any required revisions.